DISCLAIMER: I noticed this post from February 8th still bangs in views, so I’m bringing it back to the forefront of the website. I believe a lot of Larries read this post and are being converted to Zarry, or some of them are deeply wounded and lash out. We love to see it. So, I was challenged with this question by a Larrie stalker, and I want to answer it. Buckle up, it’s a long one.
After taking this viral video down due to real life death threats from Larries, I’m happy to say the relationship expert reuploaded his debunk of Larry Stylinson with a brave message in the description:
The sad thing about Larries is that they’re so desperate for validation from any passing stranger, that they take every tiny slight or debunk to heart, instead of resting assured in their proof and remaining strong in their beliefs. That’s because they know their beliefs are based entirely on lies, half-truths, and rely heavily on mass deciet of the unwitting public.
Therefore, when an unbiased 3rd party debunks their BS and it goes viral, they are out for blood and seek to silence them. What they did to this man last year was evil and despicable. I’m glad he found the gall to repost his debunk video, sending the message that those deranged shippers who threatened his family can all go phuck themselves.
Two quick and major reasons (there are many, many more) that Larry and Zarry are different:
1.) Our proof comes from ZARRY THEMSELVES. We’re not forcing a narrative on them, harassing their friends and families, sending death threats to people who try to debunk our ship, or abusing Gigi so much that she literally has to turn comments off on everything she posts (like Eleanor does.) Also, we can prove our ship with plain truth and FACTS. We are not continuously trying to prove a LIE with tons of manipulated images and clips (pretending they’re real) or with cropped images of people, or mysterious figures conveniently facing the opposite direction to pretend it’s Zayn, or using distorted audio clips, or lying about vital context and locations and dates, or using images of other ships/people and pretending it’s Zarry, like Larries do.
Because Zarry has legitimate, undeniable proof (some of which I will share below) it gives us room and liberty to theorize in an attempt to fill in certain blanks (always within reason in my personal theories — I can’t speak for other Zarries.) The blanks are where our mostly innocuous theories come into place. They are informed by the legitimate baseline of proof we’ve gotten straight from Zayn and Harry.
Larries do not have this. They have never had a sound base of real proof outside of a dead bromance (and Louis copying all of Harry’s tattoos; with Harry never reciprocating.) Larry has never ever been valid or reasonable. It is notoriously unreasonable and at times deranged. It has always been a vicious lie, a mistruth, a source of distress for Harry and his friends/family members (and Louis’), and a ridiculous conspiracy theory about an evil omnipotent management who not only kept them closeted but also kept them from sitting by each other — even though they frequently sat by each other anyway???
2.) Larry has occasionally been fueled by Louis whenever it was advantageous for him (like this past week when he wanted them to stream his music and used Harry’s birthday and tattoos to create hype around it.)
Now, let’s take a brief moment to compare the validity of Zarry vs the invalidity of Larry (at a glance, this is not a deep dive like I could do.)
This is some of Zarry’s most incontrovertible proof (something Larries do NOT have) straight from the horses’ mouths:
Here’s just a sample of Zarry’s real, mutual, and concerted matching tattoos:
Now below let’s look at some key differences in the logic and reasoning of larries vs zarries.
Larry Logic: Harry is singing Little things to Louis! (Uh, no…he isn’t. Watch that here.)
Larry Logic: He is saying “I’m in love with LOU and all HIS little things…” Hmm…how convenient is it that this sounds exactly like the proper lyrics “I’m in love with YOU and all THESE little things”? This is not valid proof of anything because it’s a moot point. He is not saying something that doesn’t sound like the original words. It’s not like you can prove it because he suddenly says “I’m in love with BETH and all HER Little Things.” because that would be easy to distinguish and argue. Unfortunately for Larries, I absolutely can argue that he is IN FACT singing the original lyrics with variations in the enunciation and delivery, since he sings the same song every day all year long. (They want so badly for him to be saying Lou that they hear literally what they want to hear.)
Zarry Logic: Watch our reasoning on the way Harry dedicated Little Things to Zayn here!
Larry logic: Louis got this ring for Harry because he might have been spotted on this one street near a certain store one day.
Zarry logic: These MFs Zayn and Harry were spotted with the exact same ring within months of each other. Harry said his rings were gifts, and Harry only took it off for one day after the mystery guy was at MSG (which we were informed 5 days before that Zayn would be there.)
Larry logic: Louis was the one there because Harry was wearing a blue suit.
Zarry logic: Someone told us days before MSG that Zarry would be together on June 22nd. Also, Zayn lives in NYC and for some reason Harry only decided to sing “Still The One” at his NYC show, not at his LA shows where Louis lives. Also, Zayn loves “Still The One” and is admittedly a fan of Shania Twain. Also Zayn posted a pic of himself right before Harry’s show and revealed what he was wearing. It was uncharacteristically dark clothes (he had been wearing bright, vibrant colors all year in 2018) and a beanie in the middle of summer to hide his bright hair. This is all similar to what the mystery vip box man was wearing. Also, after the show Harry took the rose ring off for only one day, and Zayn had that identical ring right before Harry started wearing it.
Larry Logic: The digitally added ECHO (not Harry actually saying it each time) in the bridge says golden 28 times. (Hmm…so basically it was said like only 7 times, and half of those times the word is indiscernible and layered, which means it was done by a PRODUCER, not Harry.)
Zarry Logic: This song must be about Zayn because this is the second mention of brown skin in a 12 track album and Zayn is a brown person. It seems improbable that Harry would mention brown skin in 2 songs of a mere 12 track album if he was talking about a white person and not a brown person. Harry has never openly dated a brown person. Also, Harry responds directly to a lyric in Zayn’s Golden that Zayn repeated 4x with identical language. Also HARRY NAMED HIS SONG IDENTICALLY AFTER ZAYN’S SONG. Golden vs Golden. AND HE ALSO NAMED HIS SONG “SHE” AFTER ZAYN’S “SHE.”
Larry Logic: This song is about Louis because Louis went to Jamaica that one time (with Eleanor btw.)
Sigh, the only TRUE and reasonable Jamaica Connection is a Zarry one:
Zarry Logic: This mf Harry did not just write an entire song about Zayn’s tattoos using specific meticulous language to refer to them and also making the song about Zayn’s obsession with Jamaican culture. On top of using 2 of Zayn’s identical track titles, She & Golden, and releasing his album on the anniversary of Icarus Falls with a feature track on his album called FALLING.
We could seriously go on and on and on about the vast differences in the way Larries reason and the way Zarries reason, and about the validity of Zarry vs the invalidity of Larry, but I’ll stop here and move on to the second point of this post.
PAGE TWO: Louis Using “Larry Stylinson” For Profit